|
Freegro®
tree shelters have proven to increase survival rates and accelerated
growth for a wide varieties of tree species.
Click here
to see trial result summaries:
Hybrid
Poplar Eastern
Hardwood Conifer
Hybrid
Poplar Trials
Edmonton,
Alberta, 2003 [click here
for pictures]
A trial was
set up by the Canadian Forest Service near Edmonton, Alberta at
the end of June 2003. Short Freegro® shelters (90cm or less)
were used. Preliminary mid-season comparisons
between treatments (mesh types and heights) focussed on survival,
early growth acceleration, windfirmness and browse prevention.
All treatments greatly accelerated growth(>30cm per week).
The average height of Freegro® treated stems was 1.2 m, while
the average height of untreated (control) plants was roughly 40
cm. Survival and windfirmness values were more than satisfactory.
Boardman,
Oregon, 2003 [click here for pictures]
At the end
of April 2003, a trial was set up on an irrigated hybrid poplar
plantation near the Columbia River in north-eastern Oregon. A
variety of Freegro® shelters (different heights and mesh types/aperture
size) were installed in a design that would allow for inter-treatment
comparisons of survival, growth, self-pruning, browse prevention
and windfirmness. Preliminary mid-season results showed height
growth more than double the control. Self pruning appears to be
effective on 2 of the clones tested. Browse protection and windfirmness
performance were both more than satisfactory. Mid-season observations
indicate that shorter shelter heights (<1.2m) would produce
the best results and that shelters should be removed shortly after
the tree has emerged (30cm to 60cm above). At the observed growth
rates, this would occur between 4 to 6 weeks after installation.
Each individual shelter could be re-used up to 6 to 8 times.
Fraser
Valley, British Columbia, 2002 [click
here for pictures]
In July 2002,
a trial was set up in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia to
determine the growth response of hybrid poplar cuttings (at Scott
Paper site) protected/enhanced by Freegro® Fine Mesh and Exra-Fine
Mesh shelters (15 cm diameter x 1.2 m. height). Shelters were
moved up 30 cm later in the growing season to 1.5 m. in height.
Virtually all the unrooted cuttings emerged above the 1.5 m. height
with the average height at the end of the growing season being
roughly 2.0 meters. Protected trees grew at a rate of approximately
30 cm (1 foot) per week up to the point they emerged from the
shelter. The overall growth response would have been substantially
greater if the shelters had been installed concurrently to planting
(early May). Growth and vigour were markedly better than unbrowsed
controls (heights in the 50 cm-100 cm range). Shelters will be
removed just before the beginning of growing season #2. They will
be re-used repeatedly (7-8 times). The added protection/growth
enhancement costs are roughly equal to the savings (whips vs cuttings
reduced plant handling and shipping costs, and reduced vegetation
management costs), but the result is far superior. Both stocking
levels (stem/ha) and growth will be higher, resulting in better
yields (m3/ha) and shorter optimum economic rotations. Another
important advantage observed was the absence of lateral branch
development. Having a lower bole clear of branches is an important
benefit when managing plantations for solid wood end products
(pruning costs are greatly reduced). [top]
Eastern
Hardwood Trials [click here for
pictures]
The first
Freegro® tree shelters targeting eastern hardwoods were set
up in two regions of Quebec in the spring of 2000. Six species
were included in the trials. The results have been very positive.
With red oak and silver maple, a significant growth response was
observed at the end of the first growing season. By the end of
the second growing season, all protected species were showing
height increments significantly higher than controls. Survival
rates and seedling vigour were also much better for Freegro®
protected stock. Most protected seedlings had emerged from 1.2
and 1.5 meter high Freegro® tree shelter by the end of the
second growing season. The most significant growth response observed
was with red oak, with heights ranging from 1.4 to 3.0 meters.
There was minimal damage observed, nor was there any significant
shelter displacement due to wind, snow or animal browse. No die
back or dessication problem was observed. Follow up trials have
been established at five Ontario and New York states sites. Similar
results have been observed at these sites. The only major problem
observed was herbaceous weed competition choking out seedlings
in a small percentage of protected trees. This can be avoided
by minimal micro-site preparation and/or the application of mulch.
Freegro®
tree shelters have proven effective in preventing animal damage
while enhancing growth at a level which allows vulnerable hardwoods
a chance to quickly grow above browse heights and competing vegetation.
With certain species, this can be accomplished without the use
of pre-emergent herbicides. [top]
Conifer
Trials [click here for pictures]
Several conifer
browse protection/growth enhancement comparative trials have been
established on the Pacific Coast of North America since 1999.
Given the rapid evolution of Freegro® tree shelter designs,
performance results of 2001 and 2002 trials have been considerably
better than those observed in the 1999 ‘proof of concept’
trials or even the first operational trials carried out in 2000.
In general,
the two main coastal coniferous species requiring protection,
red cedar and Douglas fir, have responded well to altered growing
conditions inside Freegro® tree shelters. Height increments
observed have been similar to adjacent plastic tube-like shelter
treatments. In large operational trials Freegro® models were
compared to the main ‘tube-like’ shelter models used
on the British Columbia coast. On good sites, most Freegro®
protected trees had emerged from 90 cm and/or 1.2 m. high shelters
after two growing seasons. On medium to poor sites, emergence
above the 1.2 meter height occurs after three to four growing
seasons. Initial problems of wind firmness observed in 1999 and
2000 trials brought about design changes. These modifications
have produced much better wind firmness results (> 95% firm)
in 2001 and 2002. Installation productivity has improved as well.
In 2001 and 2002, experienced crews were capable of installing
over 300 shelters per person day, with some crew averages approaching
400 units per person day.
[back
to top]
|